2010年4月1日星期四

成百粒

話說吃飯期間,跟同事無啦啦討論起結婚的話題,在場有位男同事跟條女同居的,於是我就問他為甚麼不乾脆結婚呢?

「唉,妳唔知架喇,我哋無乜可能結婚,要結婚起碼要俾成百粒呀!」
「成百粒?!一百萬呀?你條女乜料呀?」
「禮金廿萬啦,酒席三十萬啦,首期五十萬啦,差唔多架喇!」
「吓?你條女李嘉欣嚟架?」
「嘩,我都想呀!不過佢係苑琼丹咋!」

OK,明晒為甚麼不結婚了。

6 則留言:

新鮮人 說...

無咁大個頭,
唔好帶咁大頂帽,
無咁靚嘅女,
唔好收人咁貴禮金,
否則個女實嫁幸無期!

韻味熊貓 說...

哈哈!物無所值囉!

揚眉女子 說...

新鮮人,

真係唔明D 人點諗, 唔嫁, 不過同居, 咪又係一樣, 禮金無個女又無.

佛爺,

我係覺得佢最後個比喻好爆啫!

匿名 說...

I think you have told us a joke. So, it's not a joke. It's a real happening. And I agree with you: common-law is more or less like marriage. The guy lives together with a woman for a certain period of time (1 year?) needs to fulfil almost all the legal responsbilities as a husband does. Does that principle also apply in Hong Kong? If we can make the wedding ceremony less complicated, less expensive, less like a artificial drama, will it be nice to both of the bride and groom? Although I do not believe in the social institution of marriage/monogamy, yet I will be happy for all those who truly love/commit to each other who want to get married (without spending a lot of money for the wedding).
BbBb

匿名 說...

成百粒 都係咁話 ....happy easter 先

揚眉女子 說...

BbBb,

People just forget the meaning of marriage, funny but true.

匿名,

Happy Easter to you too!